What A Book It Is!
By
Bonnie M. Wells
Yesterday Lives Forever
Written By - Presented Here As An 'Educational' Service - By
Bonnie M. Wells
Every news article that I've ever read about Georgia Rudolph credits her with 'just finishing her first book.' Some say she just 'published' her first book, but most just say she just finished writing it. Never the less, these news articles span several years in time, so each time I have wondered if it is the same 'book' or a series of 'books.' And, each time I have finally learned it's the same one! It's title - YESTERDAY LIVES FOREVER.
Well, being the writer that I am [and yes, I do ALL my own writing, on the web site as well as my book series], every time I heard of this book I set about trying to find it. I was willing to pay for it -- heck, paying 25.00 to 30.00 for a book is customary for me, so price wasn't an issue. But, try as I might I could not find out who published the book; when it came out; or where I could obtain a copy of it.
Years went by. My friends all tried to find Rudolph's book -- always to no avail.
Then one day, just a few short months ago, I was searching for a dream that had been reported to me several years ago. I knew I had it -- but where? The dream was needed by a person in another state, another case. I dug through everything that I'd packed away in storage crates; file cabinets; desk drawers .... "What was that?" I asked out loud, as I pulled a desk drawer that I'd just closed, back open --- "YESTERDAY LIVES FOREVER" !!!!! Duh, where did this come from? I called my friend Mysde, who had worked herself half to death trying to find Rudolph's book....
"It's right here. I've had it all along, but I'll be darned if I know where or when I got it!" I said.
And it doesn't matter -- although I finally remembered where I'd been when I got another booklet that Yesterday Lives Forever was tucked inside of, so now I know a little more about a few other people than I once knew. My, my, the mystery just never ends. Well, here's one that's going to end because I'm going to see that it ends right here and right now:
Yesterday Lives Forever by Georgia Rudolph is NOT a 'BOOK'. It is a Small pamphlet, consisting of a cover made from one sheet of pink colored card stock paper, folded in half, while two sheets of white typing paper, also folded in half, and stapled to the cover, serve as the inside pages. And here it is in its entirety ----
outside: Front Cover:
"YESTERDAY
FOREVER"
Intro sheet:
UNIVERSAL
PHILOSOPHIES
ON
REINCARNATION:
Outside of first page:
The body is as significant in the realm of time in the universe as is a grain of sand on a beach.
But the soul goes on forever, soaring freely on the winds of time.
Georgia Rudolph
First page:
EMBODIMENT
Second page:
UNIVERSAL KNOWLEDGE
Third page:
PSYCHIC LINK-UP
Fourth page:
DIFFERENT BEINGS
One of the leading viewpoints is that your soul can inhabit many different types of bodies, not just human. Some of the middle east countries believe you can reincarnate in the body of many different animals. In India for example, the cow is treated as "sacred" for it may have been one of their relatives.
Fifth page:
RELATIVITY
Well, there you have it folks. A hodgepodge-collection of other people's opinions and theories! I should have known. I remember what was done in the McCrady case.
I can find nothing of any value within this mess, and find it interesting, not to mention cowardly that Ms. Rudolph ends her 'book' with a question.
There's one thing I can say about me ..... when I say I have written a 'book,' you can bet your bottom dollar I have written it and I'm not afraid to express my own opinions, ask my own questions and come up with my own theory, if one is needed.
What kind of satisfaction could anyone get from stealing the works of another? I don't know, and have never been interested in such welfare mentality.
Before leaving this page, because it's really not worthy of much more of my time and attention, I want to address one issue that Rudolph raised in her 'book.' On page 5 she states - "As children, we are taught the body and soul are one, but they are also separate. "
I don't know where she received her 'teaching' but I was NEVER taught that the body and soul are one. Never, ever taught that by anyone at any time.
And I have a question for Ms. Rudolph ..... "Since you were soooooo good at working the McCrady case, why can't you find the killers of Anna Marie Brown, Deputy Ray Clark, Terri Roach, Patsy Sparks, Kimberly and Daniel Fulton, Marie Blough, Janet Miller, Maybelle Clark, Chasity Cottrell, and at least a hundred others that are listed on my web site?
And when you get finished finding the killers of these people, why don't you see if you can't lead officer Garvey's cruiser to the dumping grounds of Alice Donovan, Samantha Burns, Brooke Wilberger, Heather Teague, Allison Jackson-Foy, Cherrie Mahan, Rachel Cooke, Jodi Huisentruit, Ashley Howley, or a thousand others that have been missing for years. Surely they are "Universal Free-floats" by this time. I'd think such a psychically sensitive person as you could just 'pick right up' on their whereabouts and lead the cops right to them.
And with you charging $200.00 per hour for 'phone conversations' in which you claim to be able to find missing people [after telling everyone in every news paper interview that you do NOT charge for helping!] I wouldn't think you'd have to charge the cops anything for your assistance. And - if you are so good at locating missing people, why don't you find your dear friend Donna's missing son? He's been gone for several years now, so what's wrong Ms. Rudolph??
January 2008 Update:
Donna's son has been 'located.' He was actually 'found' in California in 1999, but it took until 2008 to 'identify' him, and it was the FBI who identified the body that had been found so long ago ...... NOT Georgia Rudolph! She was never able to tell her friend Donna if her son was dead or alive ..... but you know something ...... I told Detective John Winstanley he was dead years and years ago. Yep, sure did, and yes, I most assuredly have a copy of the report I sent him so I can 'prove' that I said it, and when I said it.
I also informed Detective Winstanley that Donna's son John had been murdered. However, the world seems ready, able and willing to accept the alternative. So be it. I stand firm in what I said ..... "He was murdered."
Donna's Son - John
Here's a little computer research for those that are still interested:
Philosophy Of Embodiment
In essence embodiment as an idea binds two worlds of substance and spirit (or culture, thought of as intentional objects and phenomena), contrary to a duality long posited by notables like Descartes. The core idea looks to find the biological substrate not as a vessel, but as the being itself. The mind and spirit are not a sublimation of the biology, but are a method of its workings. Thus body and mind are fused into a single being - the only distinction between matter and person being the way of observing the being.
Some consider such a reduction to mathematics, or alternatively an attempt to explain mathematics (as in the cognitive science of mathematics), to be at best premature. Critics of embodiment argue that there is no one process by which the brain and linguistic and categorization categories bind to things in the environment, be they ecological or social. Thus no one model could exist.
However, the ambitious and integrative programs continue, on every scale from perception of mothers by children, to Gaia theory: the perception of the home planet of an intelligent species by that species.
The political ramifications of some of these points of view are extreme, as they imply both psychological and political notions of environmentalism - in effect, if embodiment is valid as an idea, then a single process may bind the mind to its body, family, language, and ultimately even to its environment (eco-somatics), society, species, and planet. Those who accepted some limited biological aspects of it as useful theory would find it hard to argue with more general application of it as a political or moral principle - exactly as happened with evolution.
Another concern is that embodiment theory simply reiterates ideas from behaviorism and sociobiology, combining them with theories of massive neural networks and a society of mind from computer science. It does to a degree treat ecology and environment as a homunculus, and assumes that these are beyond direct human investigation, and certainly beyond more than a very dilute control.
This in turn can offend those who believe in human dignity or the ongoing human control of Earth after a technological singularity. Embodiment theory tends to contradict many common understandings of humanism including, high on the list, that of free will. Defenders however point out that free will itself is not so compatible with real life on a planet with many incalculable forces:
If an unknowable process guides our conceptual development as a whole, starting with our neural structure, then our impressions of our family, then our home, then our local ecology and society, can we knowing that all of these are affected by global processes really feel in control of ourselves?
Sooner or later I'll get around to writing up the Definition; Interpretation & Identification Of Dreams / by Bonnie M. Wells. And yes, it really is 'my work.' I figure I'd better get it written up and posted pretty soon because I remember giving it to a group of people one time, and I recall one of them asking if she could make copies of it to give to someone else. Well, someone else better not pop up with it, because it's already been safeguarded, as has most of my work today. 1996 will not be allowed to repeat itself .... at least in that arena. / Bonnie M. Wells
March 2008 - Rudolph Becomes "Medical Diagnostic Expert" and assists doctors all across the United States and Europe in diagnosing illness in their patients! Read all about it!
Gloria / part one
Gloria / part two
Gloria / part three
Gloria / part four
Gloria / part 5, page 1
Gloria / part 5, page 2
September Story page
Pure Coincidence Book Series
Posted/updated: 9-06 / 9-07 / March 2008 // by Bonnie M. Wells
Georgia Rudolph
When people first think about the word Reincarnation, the first thought that comes into most persons minds is that of living life after life on the Earth Plain in different bodies. Many people feel the Human Body is used as a method or "Vehicle" for the Soul to get around with on the earth, only to be discarded when not needed any longer. We refer to this act of discarding as "Death." Most people who believe in this philosophy believe that only the body dies and the soul continues on forever, often choosing to come back to the Earth Plain, thus needing a new body to use. This philosophy gives us "The Theory Of Embodiment."
People who believe in or accept this theory feel the reason the soul uses different bodies in many different lives is for the purpose of "Soul Growth". The basic structure behind "Soul Growth" is that we all come from the same Universal "Energy" or "Knowledge", and while still in "Energy Form", or "Spirit", we choose to experience physical thoughts and sensations. Thus the soul needs a body. After discarding the body, we can choose to stay in "Spirit" or return again, using another body.
The purpose of this is to experience, to learn and to grow until we have reached the highest level the soul can reach and can then return back to the "Universal Energy" or "Knowledge".
People throughout time have seemed to be able to predict events and happenings before they occur. There also seems to be a large number of persons who have the ability to give information about events that have already taken place. This has been documented by many police files and murder cases when people with this ability have been called in to help solve a case. The name given to these people is "Psychic". Where do these people get this information? One theory is that of "Universal Knowledge". The structure behind this theory is that there is a great "Knowledge" in the universe and those who are "Psychically Sensitive" have the ability to "tap" into this knowledge and hence bring it forward in the form of information. If this is the case, what makes some persons more sensitive than others? The theory expresses that all people are born "Psychic" but due to our environment and conditioning through childhood we either lose, keep, or grow in our intuitive natures. For instance, a child who is raised in a home where intuitiveness is not recognized or perhaps even frowned upon is not going to grow in this knowledge or even deep this ability. When man was originally created, he was a very Metaphysical Being, but throughout the generations through conditioning, even though we are born with these abilities, we have lost what we originally were.
Another theory on Reincarnation is the theory of "Psychic Link-Ups". Not much study has been done on this theory, but I feel it still constitutes recognition.
The structure of this is best put in this synopsis:
On a clear, cool, crisp night in early fall, if you go into your backyard and look up at the sky it would be filled with hundreds of thousands of stars. Science knows the light you are seeing from those stars has taken around 2,000 years to reach the earth's atmosphere so we can see it. That light has been created by an exploding star and has traveled through time until we can see it in the night sky. This knowledge has produced the "Psychic Link" theory of Reincarnation. It is theorized that when a person dies, their thoughts and emotions continue on through time as "Universal Free-floats", and psychically sensitive people pick up on these thought waves, giving them the memories of someone who has lived before. Hence, a past-life experience is remembered.
There are several religions in the world today who look at Reincarnation as fact. Some of these religions accept only straight embodiment while others have different viewpoints.
Here in the United States, the theory of Embodiment is mostly generally accepted in those who believe in reincarnation.
The most fascinating theory as far as scientific layout goes, is the theory of reincarnation in connection with Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Einstein stated the faster you move, the slower time goes, and if you moved fast enough, you could reach the speed of light. He went on to state if you reach the speed of light you would turn into pure energy, and if you pass the speed of light you would be able to travel forward or backward in time. It is this theory that makes a lot of people believe time travel is possible. However, it has also been used to express another possibility on what reincarnation is. As children, we are taught the body and soul are one, but they are also separate. There has been a lot of study in the field of Astra- projection, the term given to when the soul leaves the body. It is almost fact that this happens, particularly in sleep. If this is the case, then if the soul were to leave the body during sleep, it would no longer be ruled by the basic laws of physics, such as time and space. Is it then not possible that we can travel forward in time collecting Universal Intelligence, bring it back with us, apply it, perhaps as children, thus producing "Child Prodigies?" Maybe this was the case with Mozart. Can it not be possible then that we can go backward, view a life, bring it forward, giving us the memories of someone else, and since the human mind is set on a time table and we have those memories, then we must have lived before?
